|
Advanced Projects, Inc. |
|
Systems Thinking
How Systems Thinking Can Improve the Results of Innovation Efforts An examination of how using systems thinking can prevent the potential waste of valuable innovation efforts. Peter Senge (The Fifth Discipline) defined a number of System Archetypes to aid recognizing, analyzing, and modifying specific systems. He describes how the Limits to Growth archetype requires identifying and raising the system constraint. The Theory of Constraints (TOC) takes this recommendation to much greater depth, proposing a process to Identify, Exploit, Subordinate, and only then Elevate the constraint, and finally to do it over again. With this approach and the Thinking Process, TOC provides a powerful method to manage this most common of system archetypes. Systems Thinking and System Engineering are related. The term Systems Thinking is more generally applied to systems that include non-physical parts, such as economic systems, government systems, interpersonal relationships, markets, and organizations. System engineering is generally concerned with the physical parts of designing, fabricating, maintaining, and operating physical systems, including computer hardware and software. System engineering can include people software, such as procedures, training, and policies. Senge describes the Theory of Constraints (although not calling it by that name) in his description of the Limits to Growth archetype. Goldratt recognizes the link of TOC to Systems Thinking, but I have not found him to refer to the limits to growth archetype as a foundation for TOC. Goldratt has taken the study and understanding of this one archetype to great breadth and depth. I periodically go into the links on the links page to see that they still exist (latest check 6/19/02). They move frequently; please send me an E-Mail if you find some inoperative. Please let me know what browser you are using. I check them with Internet Explorer.
|